These Were The Best Movies of 2014

Top 10 Movies of the Year (#10-6)

#10* (TIE)

Ode to My Father

This South Korean import about a son, in his late age, recounting the trials and tribulations of his life and paying respect to the sacrifice made by his father, made me weep openly.  I'm only a little ashamed to admit this since I wasn't the only one in the theatre who had this reaction.  We were all responding to how effective this tiny film with zero star power is at telling a simple story that resonates. 

     We follow the journey of Deok-soo from the Hungnam Evacuation of 1951 during the Korean War where everything he knows is ripped from him, to his adventures as a young coal miner in Germany, then as an engineer in Vietnam during that war, and finally as he approaches middle age and begins a quest to reunite his family.  Through it all we are rooting for Deok-soo to escape poverty and his life of complacency, even as the odds  stack up against him.  He isn't he smartest, bravest or strongest, but he is the most motivated.  Everything he does is to help his family and to honor his father by being the provider and head of household.  It's an old fashioned notion and the film follows suit, telling a straight forward chronological story that hits on all the conventions you'd expect in these types of film.  But it works.  Credit the efficient and focused direction by Yoon Je-kyoon and the strong performances throughout.  By the end of the 2 hours you will feel as if you know Deok-soo and that you've experienced with him all the joy and sadness in his life. 

 Nitpicks (why it's not #9 or 8...):  So focused is the direction that we don't get as much development of supporting characters.  This doesn't matter so much with the goofy best friend but is a noticeable loss for Deok-soo's wife (played by Lost's Yunjin Kim) and the titular "father" himself.  We don't get to know much about them which is a shame because it would have only added to the rich tapestry the film weaves.  It's not often I say a film should be longer but an extra 20-30 minutes with them would've made this film even greater.

#10* (TIE)

The Fault in Our Stars
I promise not all the movies on this list are bummers but I admit, a movie about terminally ill cancer teenagers is not a laugh riot.  But this movie isn't as depressing as you might think.  For most of it, our heroine, Hazel (Shailene Woodley), is trying to find any semblance of normality in hershort life, and she suceeds at times.  In her friendship, then courtship, with Ansel, a cancer survivor who takes a liking to her, she finds contentment and even happinness.  The elephant in the room, that she's dying, isn't something she dwells on.  She doesn't ignore it, but once it's acknowledged, not everything has to be about it.  Much of the film then, has Shailene and Ansel falling in love, something if done right, is always enthralling to watch. 

     When death does begin to creep to the forward of the narrative, it's that much more devastating because you've spent time when them doing typical teenager things, and the thought of them dying strays from your mind.  It's not fun to watch and it's certainly not fair, but that's sort of the point too.  Life isn't fair. Hazel is dying but, what are you going to do in the meantime?  The answer is to live, and Fault In our Stars shows us Hazel and company living to the fullest while we watch, captivated. 

Nitpicks:  It's Hazel's movie but Ansel plays a big part.  Yet, he isn't as developed as he should be.  For most of the film he's a knight in shining armor.  When he lets that armor down however,  it's that much more fascinating.  I wanted more of that

#9:

Nightcrawler

Finally, a movie you don't have to worry about tearing up while watching.  Nightcrawler isn't a sad movie.  It's a dark, twisted, funny and cynical movie that will make you gasp, not cry.  The film follows Louis Bloom (Jake Gyllenhaal) a loner with an intensity which his wide, almost never-blinking eyes convey  aggressively.  When he talks, he is talking both to you and through you, as if he's already figured you out and knows how to get what he wants from you, even if you've just met him.  He's not just one step ahead, he's three steps and a few twists ahead. 

     When Louis decides to become a crime scene freelancer,  he steps into a world where his intensity and willingness to do anything to accomplish his goal, is well matched by his greedy competitors and customers.  In other words, he finds the perfect job.  Of course we know he's going to go over the edge but watching him do so is fascinating nevertheless.  As he first upgrades his equipment, then starts to trespass to get better footage, then start to stage crime scenes, we know it won't end well.  How terribly it will is the question, and that anticipation makes the film suspenseful.

     Gyllenhaal gives a nuanced performance that is restrained, just like his character is.  Louis is tough to pull off however,  because the script doesn't explain the reasons he is the way he is.  While lesser actors could get lost in play such a cipher, Gyllenhaal confidently takes hold of Louis's unpredictability and uses it to keep us glued to what he will do next.

Nitpicks:  More Renee Russo!  She plays Louis's main customer and she's fantastic.  She may not be as unhinged as Louis, but Russo's character is just as hyper focused.  A relationship between them is more teased then explored, but that would've only added to the film.

#8:

Selma

Selma takes the  "Lincoln " route by dramatizing an important event in Martin Luther King Jr's career, without covering the entirety of his life.  This approach allows more character development and deliberate pacing, giving the audience a chance to get to know the main characters. 

     David Oyelowo is magnificent as MLK.  He gives a performance where he effectively  conveys both the commanding presence of MLK Jr. while he is preaching, marching, and lecturing, and the more human side of a flawed father and husband while inhabiting quiet moments at home.  I cannot tell you enough how impressed I was that the film didn't ignore MLK's infidelities.  Lesser movies would've made no mention of it, not wanting to risk muddying the thematic waters.  But Selma explores it, giving Carmen Ejogo (as Corretta Scott King), a chance to shine as the wife who hates her husband's actions, but still loves him.  That's complicated, and a risk that could've very well not played off, making MLK a monster or Corretta Scott King just a victim.  Instead, Selma treats it with the dignity and importance it deserves.  Just because MLK did something bad, doesn't make him a bad man.  It makes him a man no better than any other, which makes what he did for African Americans during the Civil Rights Movement even more impressive.  Selma doesn't canonize MLK.  The film treats its subject with reverence yes, but doesn't try to hide the fact that above all, MLK was a man.

Nitpicks:   There are a lot of characters in Selma: student protestors who are upset with MLK for coming in and stealing their thunder, the dozens that make up MLK's entourage, the politicians who were for and against the march, the clergy who came in to assist when MLK put out a call to those of faith...the movie introduces all of them and gives them a few scenes each but I'd rather them not be introduced if they were given such short shrift.  There is very little resolution in some of these minor character's arcs.  I know that's part of history, because the success of Selma didn't mean the end of anything in particular, but you do walk away feeling a bit cheated narrative-wise.

#7:

Gone Girl
Twisty and twisted, is the best way to describe this film adaptation from the best seller.   The story of Nick Dunne, whose wife Amy's disappearance puts him under suspicion, explores a lot of themes effectively.  There's the veneer of the "perfect marriage" crumbling as facts come out about Nick and Amy that are none too pleasant; There's the sensationalism of the murder by the media, especially when there's a cold, seemingly-emotionless husband.  There's the theme of feminism and at the same time, anti-feminism. There's even some stuff about the economic recession of 2008.   All of this plays out as subtext in a great thriller that keeps you guessing.  Is Nick really a remorseless killer?  Is he a hapless husband being railroaded by the police?  Affleck and Rosamund Pike (as the titular Gone Girl) are fantastic, each playing their true character's motivations close to the vest, until it's time to reveal them.  When the answer answers come they aren't what you expect, and each revelation changes how you feel about the characters in the movie.  It's exciting, and you can't take your eyes off of the screen. 

Nitpick:  Nick's sister could've been better developed and for all the talk about how great of a lawyer Tyler Perry's character is, he doesn't do much but react to what Nick uncovers.  Plus, I know this is based on a book so the plot is set, but how great would it have been had we gotten to the courtroom in the Gone Girl Universe?  What twisty and twisted happenings could've  happened with a televised trial? 

#6

Chef

A story about communication based around cooking, this small movie by Jon Favreau will make you happy and hungry at the same time.  Favreau casts himself as a chef who's lost his mojo, unable to connect with his former self (communicate, if you will) or his son.  He's in a job which he hates and finding that he's lost the love of cooking.  He sets out on a journey of self discovery ( I know that sounds boring but it's not I promise) with his son and best friend in tow.  They buy a food truck and go back to the basics, cooking great food simply to make other people feel great.  As they travel they tweet, facebook, instagram and vine the happenings, as Favreau begins to understand himself, his son, and the people he is cooking for better.  There are some fun cameos as well and the film makes you laugh.  This is one of the most overlooked gems of this past year.

Nitpicks:  Not many.  Sofia Vergara (as Favreau's ex-wife and mother of his child) could've used more face time and I'm not a huge Johannson fan in general, but she's fine here.

Top 10 Movies of the Year (#5-1)

#5

The Lego Movie

Everything is Awesome with this imaginative, fun spinoff based on the popular toy brand.  This might have been one of the biggest surprises of 2014 because of how smart and how much heart the movie has.  Chris Pratt is great as "Emmet," our everyman who just wants to be part of the crowd when he finds himself in the middle of a battle for the future of his world where he is the "chosen one."   He's forced, therefore, to stand out, even if he doesn't think he is worthy of it.   It's the Matrix with legos, full of plenty of action and intelligent (and dumb) jokes that make it perfect for adults or kids.  The movie takes a sweet turn toward the end, mixing a live action Will Ferrell perfectly with the animated Lego land. 

Nitpicks:  I suppose I wasn't as smitten with the romance between Emmet and Wyldstyle (Elizabeth Banks) as the film wanted me to be and Princes Unikitty was a bit annoying.  

 

#4

Guardians of the Galaxy

The only true big budget blockbuster on my list, this franchise-starter managed to make a team of misfits, which include a genetically engineered raccoon and talking tree, relatable.  The rag tag Guardians are misfits, outcasts who only fit in with others who don't fit in.  That's the secret to why we love them so much.  We see us in them and are rooting for them to first, overcome their differences, then band together and kick some a**. 

Marvel pulls off a miracle, taking these unknowns and building them into household names.  Who wasn't in love with Groot this past summer?  Who doesn't think Starlord is the coolest superhero human ever (not including Tony Stark)?  The movie is funny, weird, and weirdly funny.  It's full of spectacular action sequences and has a villain in Ronan the Accuser that we want to punch, so we relish the Guardians eventual victory against him that much more.  And add to all this the wonderful world building Guardians did.  The universe they inhabit is starkly different from Earth and needs explaining.  That's tough to do, because you have to tell an entertaining story while helping the audience become familiar with their weird surroundings.  Guardians does it perfectly, making us feel so comfortable in a strange place, we want to return as soon as we leave.

Nitpicks:  Okay so each of the Guardians is certainly an archetype and there weren't any real surprises plot wise here, but who cares?  This movie rocked my world (galaxy?).

#3

Life, Itself

To call "Life Itself," Steve James's touching new documentary about the legendary film critic Roger Ebert, an ode to Ebert would be to miss the point.  The movie is about "life itself," just as the title suggests, meaning it's an examination of life, and more specifically of life well lived.  Its particular case study is a more public figure but one whose life was full of the same ups, downs, successes, failures, triumphs and tragedies as all our lives.  Ebert began the documentary 4 months before his eventual death, while he was undergoing rehab and doesn't shy away from the medical gruesomeness. His nurse comes in to suction the phlem, poking a tube right through where his bottom jaw should be but where only a flap of skin remains.  He says it would be a misstep to not show everything and he's right but not because the documentary would be any less truthful.  By showing everything, the film is showing an important part of life:  sickness and dying.  That's the ending of Ebert's extraordinary life and he acknowledges as much.  Yet in the end, it's only a small part of it. 

     The movie takes you through Ebert's humble midwestern beginnings, through his rebellious and misguided youth and then through his extraordinary run as one half of the most influential movie critic duos of all time. You see how he progresses, regresses and finds success first in work. then in his personal life. All is recounted using photos and narration from his audio book as well as interviews with him and his wife Chaz.  It's tough to watch, especially when Ebert, by his own admission, "fades" towards the end but it's a captivating and heartfelt journey. At the end of his life Ebert doesn't fear death. Instead, he lives by a motto popularized by Dr. Seuss which I will paraphrase here: don't cry that's it over, be happy that it happened.   "It" in this case is his life, and after watching this film you'll feel the same way, and possibly a bit more reflective of yours.

Nitpicks:  I would've loved more focus on his TV career post-Siskel, especially as he enjoyed a successful run with Roeper, a critic who gained the respect, if not love, of his audience.

 

#2

Boyhood

Boyhood is unlike any other movie you've ever.  Shot over 12 years with the same actors, the audience follows Mason, a 6 year old kid much like any other, as he matures and faces all the triumphs and frustrations that growing up throws at you.   A narrative sweeping across time isn't exactly rare, but what is unique is the bond we feel with the characters.   Sometimes when watching movies where the protagonist ages 10 years every 20 minutes, you have to squint to remember the child that once was and it disconnects you.  Here, you don't have to imagine that the Mason we see at 15 is the mason we saw at 6 because he's played by the same actor.  As Mason, Ellar Coltrane is the soul of a film that couldn't work without him.  And as his well-meaning, but flawed parents, Patricia Arquette and Ethan Hawke give confident, understated performances that can best be described as "non actory."  you really do feel like there's a camera in some real person's home.

                The sheer boldness of the move from director Richard Linklater deserves  praise but it would be of the faint variety if the film didn't also succeed in telling a worthwhile story.  Luckily Linklater's masterpiece does .  The film therefore, doesn't come off like a film school experiment but a sweeping epic, where the audience emerges as having been more of an experience than just a movie.

 

And Finally, The BEST Movie of the Year (#1):

Whiplash

It's fitting that Whiplash, writer-director  Damien Chazelle 's debut film, is great because good just wouldn't do for a movie which spends most of its 106 minute running time rallying against the phrase "good job."  Because "good" really means "less than" and "less than" is worthless.  So the logic of J.K. Simmon's musical teacher Terence Fletcher goes.  He's tired of the "good job" generation and is determined to find greatness in the entitled mass of worthlessness that is his students, even if it means beating it out of him.   And that's hyperbole.   Fletcher mentally, physically and emotionally beats the worthlessness ("good") out of his student in an attempt to find greatness, as callously as one might peel the skin off an orange.  Enter Andrew Neiman (Miles  Teller), an impressive drum major who is certainly good, even very good, but is he great?   Andrew wants to be and submits to Fletcher's humiliations in order to help get there, sacrificing his personal health and relationships in the process.  The movie makes a strong argument that that is in fact the only way to truly be great:  to commit so completely to your craft that everything else (people included) is a distraction to be avoided. 

     But is the price of greatness worth it?   Fletcher certainly seems to think so, and part of Andrew's journey is trying to figure that out for himself.  Simmons gives the best performance of the year as the drill sergeant / attack dog / tyrant of a teacher who will have you glued to the screen as he scares the s*** out of his students and you.  In many ways, Simmons is even more frightening than the skinhead white supremacist he played for 6 years on HBO's OZ.  Teller in given the less showy character to play, but that's the point.  Andrew is understated and humble, reserved and docile.  It's only at the insistence of Andrew that he breaks out of this shell , because in order to achieve greatness, you have to leave everything else behind.

 

Latest comments